Chicago Fire vs New England Rev.
Possession
- Chicago Fire 53%
- New England Rev. 47%
Match statistics
| Corner Kicks |
| Yellow Cards |
Lineups
1
Brady
11
Zinckernagel
9
Cuypers
19
Bamba
24
Jr
5
Rogers
3
Elliott
15
Gutman
10
Franco
42
DAvilla
17
Gutierrez
30
Turner
10
Vicent
7
Chancalay
25
Miller
4
Beason
3
Jiménez
12
Feingold
17
Ganago
80
Yusuf
14
Yueill
41
Langoni
Players statistics
| N | Player | G | A | P | S | SO | BS | SO | O | Fo | Fc | YC | RC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Haile-Selassie | 0 | 0 | 11.00 (100.00%) | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 12 | Barlow | 0 | 0 | 1.00 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 22 | Pineda | 0 | 0 | 0 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 23 | Acosta | 0 | 0 | 8.00 (88.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 25 | Gal | 0 | 0 | 0 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 34 | |
González | 0 | 0 | 1.00 (100.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | Jr. | 0 | 0 | 13.00 (92.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 36 | Reynolds | 0 | 0 | 0 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 38 | Cupps | 0 | 0 | 0 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | Brady | 0 | 0 | 34.00 (86.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 9 | ||||||||||||||
| 11 | Zinckernagel | 0 | 0 | 53.00 (79.00%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 10 | ||||||||||||||
| 9 | Cuypers | 0 | 0 | 24.00 (96.00%) | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | |
| 11 | ||||||||||||||
| 19 | |
Bamba | 0 | 0 | 27.00 (82.00%) | 3.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | ||||||||||||||
| 24 | Jr | 0 | 0 | 44.00 (84.00%) | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | ||||||||||||||
| 5 | Rogers | 0 | 0 | 53.00 (90.00%) | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | ||||||||||||||
| 3 | Elliott | 0 | 0 | 53.00 (88.00%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | ||||||||||||||
| 15 | Gutman | 0 | 0 | 44.00 (76.00%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | ||||||||||||||
| 10 | Franco | 0 | 0 | 65.00 (92.00%) | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7 | ||||||||||||||
| 42 | DAvilla | 0 | 0 | 54.00 (87.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8 | ||||||||||||||
| 17 | Gutierrez | 0 | 0 | 42.00 (81.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | |
| N | Player | G | A | P | S | SO | BS | SO | O | Fo | Fc | YC | RC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Bye | 0 | 0 | 2.00 (100.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 16 | Omsberg | 0 | 0 | 15.00 (94.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 18 | Oyirwoth | 0 | 0 | 21.00 (90.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 23 | Sands | 0 | 0 | 5.00 (67.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | |
| 24 | Bono | 0 | 0 | 0 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 32 | Fry | 0 | 0 | 0 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 38 | Klein | 0 | 0 | 0 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 59 | George | 0 | 0 | 0 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 88 | |
Farrell | 0 | 0 | 0 (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 30 | Turner | 0 | 0 | 31.00 (68.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 11 | ||||||||||||||
| 10 | |
Vicent | 0 | 0 | 57.00 (80.00%) | 4.00 | 2.00 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | ||||||||||||||
| 7 | Chancalay | 0 | 0 | 13.00 (62.00%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | Miller | 0 | 0 | 28.00 (79.00%) | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | ||||||||||||||
| 4 | Beason | 0 | 0 | 63.00 (90.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | ||||||||||||||
| 3 | Jiménez | 0 | 0 | 61.00 (88.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | ||||||||||||||
| 12 | Feingold | 0 | 0 | 34.00 (89.00%) | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 9 | ||||||||||||||
| 17 | |
Ganago | 0 | 0 | 16.00 (73.00%) | 3.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | ||||||||||||||
| 80 | Yusuf | 0 | 0 | 59.00 (90.00%) | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.00 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7 | ||||||||||||||
| 14 | Yueill | 0 | 0 | 42.00 (95.00%) | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | ||||||||||||||
| 41 | Langoni | 0 | 0 | 25.00 (79.00%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | |
Preview match Chicago Fire - New England Rev.
Team Chicago Fire is located in the middle of the table. (16 place). Form team looks like this: In the last 5 matches (league + cup) gain 10 points. Chicago Fire has not been defeated at home from 3 matches. The most goals in Major League Soccer for Chicago Fire scored: Hugo Cuypers 15 goals, Philip Zinckernagel 11 goals, Gutierrez 8 goals. Most goals developed: Hugo Cuypers 1 assists, Philip Zinckernagel 10 assists, Gutierrez 1 assists.
Played 27 matches this season. Won 11 matches 6 ended in a draw. 10 were defeated. In 74.07% matches the total goals in the match was over 2.5 goals (Over 2.5). In 85.19% matches the sum of the goals was greater than 1.5 Goals (Over 1.5). In 4 matches Chicago Fire has not lost the goal. In 20 games, each team scored a goal in the match (both teams to score). Average goals: 1.85 per match
Team New England Rev. is located in the middle of the table. (22 place). New England Rev. in 5 last matches (league + cup) have collected6 points. To defend Chicago Fire the most demanding players will be Gil de Pareja Vicent 9 goals, Leonardo Campana 6 goals, Chancalay 4 goals, because this season they scored the most goals for New England Rev. of the entire composition. Players with the most assists: Gil de Pareja Vicent 6 assists, Leonardo Campana 1 assists, Chancalay 1 assists.
Played 28 matches this season. Won 8 matches 7 ended in a draw. 13 were defeated. In 50.00% matches the total goals in the match was over 2.5 goals (Over 2.5). In 71.43% matches the sum of the goals was greater than 1.5 Goals (Over 1.5). In 9 matches New England Rev. has not lost the goal. In 14 games, each team scored a goal in the match (both teams to score). Average goals: 1.29 per match
Direct matches: New England Rev. won more direct matches. Chicago Fire won 30 matches , New England Rev. won 30 direct matches, was a 21 draws. In 44 matches the sum of the goals both teams was greater than 2.5 (Over 2.5), and 64 matches teams scored more than 1.5 goals (Over 1.5). In 47 matches the both teams scored a least one goal (Both teams to score).
If you want to compare this teams or you looking for more stats H2H Chicago Fire New England Rev.
League table and stats click here




Major League Soccer
3